On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 09:58, Warren Togami <[email protected]> wrote:
> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20090917-r816097-n
> Today is showing the same failure, except this time wt-en3 and wt-en4 are
> missing.  Something is wrong with ruleqa?

I think it's a delay in processing -- they're there now...

'20090917-r816097-n   (Viewing)
bb-doc bb-fredt bb-guenther_fraud bb-jhardin bb-jhardin_fraud bb-jm
bb-kmcgrail bb-trec_enron bb-zmi dos wt-en1 wt-en2 wt-en3 wt-en4
wt-jp1 wt-jp2 [+]'

However, the 20090915-r815022-n case is less simple.
LOGS.all-ham-wt-en4.20090915-r815222-n.log.gz is a file containing no
logs:

# mass-check results from [email protected], on Tue Sep
15 18:06:21 UTC 20
09
# M:SA version 3.3.0-alpha3-r808953
# SVN revision: 815222
# Date: 20090915T180621Z
# Perl version: 5.008008 on x86_64-linux-thread-multi
# Switches: '"--hamlog=ham-wt-en4.log" "--spamlog=spam-wt-en4.log" -j
4 --progress --re
use "spam:mbox:/home/sa-sorter/mail/TSPAM"
"spam:mbox:/home/sa-sorter/mail/TSPAM-10"'


Could it be that the uploading process is uploading before the
mass-checks complete?  Once a file appears in the rsync dir, it's
added for processing, and later modifications will not be picked up.

-- 
--j.

Reply via email to