https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6155
Adam Katz <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #116 from Adam Katz <[email protected]> 2009-10-20 13:08:15 UTC --- Standing up for RDNS_NONE ... http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/week/RDNS_NONE/detail bb_trec_enron has 98.9497% of its ham match RDNS_NONE, which is to say that it's bogus. Discounting that corpus, RDNS_NONE matches 58.7244% of the total spam corpus and 1.7463% of the total ham corpus (down from 12.1273%), which makes it far more interesting. Many of the people on the sa-users list have manually scored RDNS_NONE higher than the default 0.1. I score it at 0.9 on my own production servers. (Not sure if this is the right venue -- or if I'm an approved kibitzer) -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
