https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6155
--- Comment #119 from Warren Togami <[email protected]> 2009-10-20 13:47:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #118) > ... despite the current corpus data (unless 1.7% is a high ham hit-rate)? http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20091017-r826198-n/RDNS_NONE/detail The most recent weekly run has pretty substantial hits even outside of the synthetic corpus. Adam, this like your RCVD_IN_APNIC are examples of inherently prejudiced rules. It might work for the most part, and you might accept the risk of accidental FP's because the score alone wont push it above the threshold. However the combined risks of multiple prejudiced rules is too great. Prejudiced rules should be up to the sysadmin if they want to enable. We should not highly score any known prejudiced rules in the default ruleset. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
