https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6155
--- Comment #130 from Mark Martinec <[email protected]> 2009-10-26 11:03:28 UTC --- > > The RCVD_IN_DNSWL_* scores are hand-tweaked (according to Comment 101), > > otherwise the _MED stands out above the _HI due to its significantly higher > > hit rate. > > score RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW 0 -0.6 0 -1.1 > > score RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED 0 -1.5 0 -1.2 > > score RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI 0 -1.8 0 -1.8 > > Is there a particular reason why these are so much different from those in > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/rules/50_scores.cf: > > | score RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW 0 -1 0 -1 > | score RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED 0 -4 0 -4 > | score RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI 0 -8 0 -8 The -1/-4/-8 were manually provided (don't know the background on this decision). The RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED in my GA results was obtained automatically, and the other two were manually adjusted to make some sense compared to _MED. Btw, the GA results on scoreset 3 from one of my previous runs were: RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW -2.761 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED -0.999 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI -0.966 -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
