https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6155
--- Comment #131 from Matthias Leisi <[email protected]> 2009-10-26 11:36:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #130) > The -1/-4/-8 were manually provided (don't know the background on this > decision). Other whitelisting rules (HABEAS_*, RCVD_IN_IADB_*, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED etc) have the same scores as in the previous 50_scores.cf. I was wondering why the dnswl.org rules have specifically lower scores than in previous versions - and extremely low scores. This is worrying me, as it would indicate we have a quality issue in the dnswl.org data. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
