On Sun, 27 Dec 2009, Warren Togami wrote:
Scoring
=======
Currently auto-promoted rules all have the score of 1. Scores need to
be defined in rules/50_scores.cf to have any other score.
I propose that we have simple, low bar of requirements to control
assignment of any score greater than 1.
* One committer per point must agree, rounded up. (1.4 points require
two committers to agree. 2.3 points require three.)
* No bug required, but state who agreed in the commit.
I was hoping that at least some sort of automatic analysis for assigning
scores could be incorporated into the process. Is the consensus that the
nightly masscheck corpus isn't large enough to support doing this?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[email protected] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [email protected]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fetters imposed on liberty at home have ever been forged out
of the weapons provided for defense against real, pretended, or
imaginary dangers from abroad. -- James Madison, 1799
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
80 days since President Obama won the Nobel "Not George W. Bush" prize
