On 12/28/2009 01:32 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009, Warren Togami wrote:
Scoring
=======
Currently auto-promoted rules all have the score of 1. Scores need to
be defined in rules/50_scores.cf to have any other score.
I propose that we have simple, low bar of requirements to control
assignment of any score greater than 1.
* One committer per point must agree, rounded up. (1.4 points require
two committers to agree. 2.3 points require three.)
* No bug required, but state who agreed in the commit.
I was hoping that at least some sort of automatic analysis for assigning
scores could be incorporated into the process. Is the consensus that the
nightly masscheck corpus isn't large enough to support doing this?
That would be ideal, but yes, the nightly masscheck is WAY too small.
Even our mcsnapshot was too small and required lots of manual massaging
to output scores that satisfied us.
Warren
