https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6294
Justin Mason <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Justin Mason <[email protected]> 2010-01-20 03:07:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > By the spirit of "Re: Rule updates after 3.3.0" agreed to by jm, it seems the > two of us agreeing to 3.0 points and to enable this rule is good enough. I > would normally check this in to force active and scores, but it is unclear to > me where to check this in now that we're past the 3.3.0 cut point. I'm ok with this, but the team as a whole are not; Daryl expressed discomfort with this idea: 'I don't really like the system, as the standard way to do things, at all. I think it may jeopardize our accuracy and credibility if we start assigning scores this way, as the standard way. If there were no other option I would say sure, but instead, I promise to fix the daily score-gen.' Daryl -- care to comment? BTW, I find it very odd that we have no hits at all. even with transient listings, we should see _something_ -- even if just FPs on old mail! there may be a bug there that needs investigation. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
