https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6314
--- Comment #11 from Karsten Bräckelmann <[email protected]> 2010-02-01 12:15:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > > Changing bug: Remove spamassassin.spec from future releases > > Any objections? > > None so far... Well, I haven't seen any real reasoning why to flame it, either. (In reply to comment #4) > I do not support the spec file in the upstream tarball. We might be better > off > just removing it. Different distributions package spamassassin in different > ways and the upstream method can only confuse matters. How is that? Are you confused by the existence of the upstream spec file? Is any packager confused by it? I'd be quite surprised. On the other hand, I have been using the spec file to build SA as vanilla as possible, and not wait for the latest version to appear in $distro. I expect there are other users out there who do the same. Users who are unlikely to keep up with SA bugzilla and object here. Since this bug turned into a request to remove a feature, I don't see the need for others to object yet. The first and most important question is, *why* we *want* to remove the spec file. What is its real advantage? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
