Ping -- can we get votes on 6335 in particular please? We'll need to make a release tarball and collect 3 +1's on that too, and the DBL is now live without a supporting release, so it's getting urgent.
--j. On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 16:02, Justin Mason <[email protected]> wrote: > ok, so my round up of those is as follows: > > agreed, this is a must, please comment: > 6335 Spamhaus DBL > > another must, this needs 2 votes: > 6294 RCVD_IN_CSS rule doesn't trigger > > This is not ready, still apparent disagreement in comments: > 6313 (a taint fix) > > This is not vital -- could wait for a 3.3.2, doesn't fix a live bug: > 6241 mkrules does not understand newer options and 'else' > > These need 1 vote, not vital: > 6310 (a taint fix) > 6267 (mainly documenting the already existing functionality) > 6072 (POD warnings - it's really ugly when 'man' complains > every time before showing a page) > 6340 VPOPMAIL > > These are not ready for review yet, so IMO won't make 3.3.1: > 6271 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX rule should be dropped > 6356 (Windows) > 6337 (not fixed yet, svn snapshot not building) > > --j. > > > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 14:26, Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 3/1/2010 8:02 AM, Mark Martinec wrote: >>> >>> On Monday March 1 2010 11:32:32 Justin Mason wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> any bugs that we want to get into an impeding 3.3.1 release? >>>> the DBL bug is just about ready to go, bar reviews. >>>> >>> >>> must: >>> 6335 Spamhaus DBL >>> 6313 (a taint fix) >>> 6241 mkrules does not understand newer options and 'else' >>> 6310 (a taint fix) >>> 6267 (mainly documenting the already existing functionality) >>> 6072 (POD warnings - it's really ugly when 'man' complains >>> every time before showing a page) >>> >>> I'd like to see also: >>> 6294 RCVD_IN_CSS rule doesn't trigger >>> 6271 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX rule should be dropped >>> 6356 (Windows) >>> 6340 VPOPMAIL >>> >>> Many of the above are already in review mode. >>> >>> Mark >>> >> >> On the ones i've been personally working on, I think 6337 is important and >> chains to the patch on 6304. >> >> Regards, >> KAM >> >> > > > > -- > --j. > -- --j.
