On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 18:11 +0000, Justin Mason wrote:
> 2010/3/15 Karsten Bräckelmann <guent...@rudersport.de>:
> > On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 18:21 +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
> >> --- 3.003001.TAR/updates_spamassassin_org.cf
> >> +++ 3.003001.NET/updates_spamassassin_org.cf
> >> @@ -50 +50,4 @@
> >> include updates_spamassassin_org/72_active.cf
> >> +include updates_spamassassin_org/72_scores.cf
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> +include updates_spamassassin_org/local.cf
> >> +include updates_spamassassin_org/regression_tests.cf
> >
> > Not in the tarball!?
I'm much more worried about the missing 72_scores.cf.
> > A quick glimpse seems mostly harmless otherwise. Just a few rules that
> > have been removed recently, like RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD, which are still in
> > the tar but won't be in the sa-update rule-set. Wonder why...
>
> they haven't been backported to the 3.3 branch. hmm. do we need to
> redo our release procedures to take this into account?
But sa-update would get rid of them? Yes, that's an inconsistency.
Though probably not a blocker.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
