https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6515
--- Comment #3 from Mark Zealey <[email protected]> 2010-11-23 02:25:19 UTC --- Surely that is an issue with the time_limit feature itself then rather than my changes to spamd (which merely make things a bit nicer for the client and less confusing for the user)? I guess if you want to go down this route of argument you'd want to put big fat warnings on anything that uses the timeout code and also make it return a 0 score or something like that. The current way of spamd simply closing the connection on child timeout is not server-friendly, and the current behaviour of spamd silently ignoring any time_limit in the config file is not user-friendly Mark -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
