https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6536
Summary: "reuse" DNSWL and IADB Rules in masscheck
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Rules
AssignedTo: [email protected]
ReportedBy: [email protected]
Created an attachment (id=4842)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4842)
Patch
I am writing this ticket because it was suggested that I shouldn't be modifying
other committers' sandboxes without RTC with 3 votes. I think this as a
steadfast policy without common sense "good judgment" exception is a
counter-productive waste of time for the following reasons:
* I am permitted to use good judgment in changing anything outside of the
sandbox with CTR instead of RTC as this is trunk.
* felicity has clearly not been participating for a long time, and he has
failed to respond to my private request to make this change.
* Any of us can plainly see that this change is negligible and absolutely safe.
* If this is truly policy, my options are either to quit, or to file an
annoying ticket on every trivial, obviously correct change. Isn't common sense
a better policy?
What exactly are people afraid of?
I hereby give permission for any other committer to change anything in my
sandbox if their personal judgment deems it is safe and not counter to the
intent of my rules. I trust you not to introduce breakage in my sandbox. I
don't expect for this to ever be a problem, but if I disagree with your change
then we can talk about it.
Under protest, I post this negligible patch for review and votes.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
