https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6536
Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Status Whiteboard|1 votes needed |RTC --- Comment #4 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2011-01-20 12:03:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > +1 for opening dead sandboxes to other contributors. Autopromote now means the > sandboxes are risky to abandon. > > Should we administratively set a grace period for when we consider a sandbox > abandoned? A year of no dev contact or updates by the owner? There are six > sandboxes that haven't been touched in 18 months... The way I viewed it is if the committer is still consider active, the sandbox is off-limits without asking them first. However, perhaps this is time to consider moving some committers to non-active status. But please move this to the dev@ list. Warren, you have your three votes and can apply the patch. > Is there a contributor contact list in a standard location? If not, I'd > suggest > adding one. trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/contributors.txt perhaps? Good idea. Possible to make it non-published except to committers so things like home phone numbers, etc. could be added? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
