https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6526
--- Comment #17 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2011-01-20 16:49:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > Hmm, could you go ahead so I can learn from your example? I am not 100% sure > what you mean. I'm not sure it's ever been done. From looking, it appears scores like 0.001 were used which doesn't achieve the goal of saving the query. So my belief is we need to disable these rules in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf by going into 50_scores.cf and setting the scores to 0.0 for these rules. 20_dnsbl_tests.cf:header __RFC_IGNORANT_ENVFROM eval:check_rbl_envfrom('rfci_envfrom', 'fulldom.rfc-ignorant.org.') 20_dnsbl_tests.cf:header DNS_FROM_RFC_DSN eval:check_rbl_sub('rfci_envfrom', '127.0.0.2') 20_dnsbl_tests.cf:header DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX eval:check_rbl_sub('rfci_envfrom', '127.0.0.8') 20_dnsbl_tests.cf:header __DNS_FROM_RFC_POST eval:check_rbl_sub('rfci_envfrom', '127.0.0.3') 20_dnsbl_tests.cf:header __DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE eval:check_rbl_sub('rfci_envfrom', '127.0.0.4') 20_dnsbl_tests.cf:header __DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS eval:check_rbl_sub('rfci_envfrom', '127.0.0.5') I would then cut and paste the existing score lines from there to a new file v332.pre, comment them and write a note that these were disabled by default in the core rules due to poor performance and to enable them, uncomment the scores. Does a score of 0.0 make it so that mass check doesn't test the rule? Finally, 72_active.cf has a meta rule RFC_ABUSE_POST that also should be scored to 0 and added to the pre file. Anyone know a better procedure? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
