https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6534
Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #12 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2011-03-31 14:10:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > > I suggested it FOR TESTING. I simply noted that it was not among the usual > > DNSBL suspects that SA normally scores. I didn't say that it was good; only > > that it was missing. > > I'm sorry for the misunderstanding. I was somehow under the impression that > your example rules were what you used in production (thus tested) and I copied > your rules verbatim at first. This became alarming as UBL is utterly broken > at > the server and UCEPROTECT had syntax errors. I have to say that after running into an IP on UCEPROTECT's powered backscatterer.org, I was shocked to see they charge money for delistings. I consider this to be unethical. It's akin to paying to be allowed to Spam and it severely harms their credibility. Something to be considered. Regards, KAM -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
