https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6534
--- Comment #19 from Warren Togami <[email protected]> 2011-04-12 04:02:22 EDT --- http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20110122-r1062119-n/T_RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT_L1/detail Results from 1/22/2011 http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20110409-r1090548-n/T_RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT_L1/detail Results from 4/9/2011 * Recent results indicate 1.3% FP rate on the past week of ham, ranging up to 2.5% FP's in recent weeks. This is worse than our measurements in January. * 88% spam overlap with RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL. (Most likely the only new DNSBL to be added to spamassassin-3.4. Look at its stellar spam detection performance with almost zero FP's!) * 83% spam overlap with RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL. * 63% spam overlap with RCVD_IN_PSBL. * 62% spam overlap with RCVD_IN_PBL. >From multiple months of analysis showing roughly the same thing, it seems clear that UCEPROTECT is a little too unsafe and redundant for spamassassin users. I suppose we can remove it from masscheck for now. But I'd like to measure it again every few months to see if it has changed any. I like being able to definitively warn people against stuff like this with fresh data. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
