On 2011-04-01 23:41, [email protected] wrote:
I'm not all that curious about the fact that they put their plugin at the
top, out of chronological order, again.
What I'm curious about is the change of the "Added" date, to 8 months
earlier. Is it a coincidence that after I put them back in chronological
order, if I had used the new date they provided, they would have been
the first listed commercial plugin, and the first with a logo?
apologize for the noise
I only just noticed the "Unmaintained Custom Plugins"
