On 4/1/2011 11:41 AM, [email protected] wrote:
I'm not all that curious about the fact that they put their plugin at the
top, out of chronological order, again.
What I'm curious about is the change of the "Added" date, to 8 months
earlier. Is it a coincidence that after I put them back in chronological
order, if I had used the new date they provided, they would have been
the first listed commercial plugin, and the first with a logo?
My only comment on this is rather with the "Maintained" date.
Maintained means little if the plugin hasn't been updated for years but
continues to work with modern spamassassin versions. How about
"Maintained <DATE> tested with spamassassin-3.3.1"?
Warren
