https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6579
--- Comment #6 from Lawrence <[email protected]> 2011-05-02 04:38:48 UTC --- I'm only approaching this from the POV of a SA user, but I never understood why SA doesn't have a meta rule that does the following meta DNS_CHECK_PASSED (SPF_PASS || DKIM_VALID) And then use that for other rules such as any rules that shouldn't trigger when a DNS check passes. I agree that the specific exclusion for Twitter would inevitably lead to a whack-a-mole situation with other exclusions being required in the future. My solution is a bit more lenient, but would do the job. How many spam e-mails truly hit these rules, and actually pass SPF or DKIM? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
