https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6526
--- Comment #37 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2011-05-11 19:13:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #36) > (In reply to comment #35) > > > Suggesting to remove the v332.pre. > > > > > > Reopening to sort out this concern. > > > > This is a blocker to releasing 3.32 IMO. In hindsight, you are correct. I > > didn't think about it when applying the patch. > > > > Is there any existing cf convention to follow for this? > > > > My thoughts are to create a v332.cf with an opening comment similar to > > v332.pre > > but reflecting rules rather than plugins. Or to add this to the bottom of > > local.cf. > > I don't see any legitimate reason to keep this in any form in spamassassin. I > think we should just delete the .pre file as Mark suggests. I disagree but I'm not voting -1. I'd prefer the commented rule stays there for administrators to make an informed decision. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
