https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6609
--- Comment #10 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2011-05-30 12:30:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > uname isn't a good test for arch. You need to know from build environment > > itself if it is lib or lib64. How is it getting the libdir contents? > > If you can't get lib vs. lib64 from the build environment, then you are better > off asking the userspace for the arch than to trust uname. uname may lie to > you because the kernel may not match the userspace arch. > > rpm -q rpm --qf '%{arch}' > > This asks rpm what is the arch of the rpm package itself. You'll get x86_64 > for 64bit, or i[3456]86 for 32bit. How does a downstream version of redhat solve the issue? Anyone look at an srpm and see if they have a patch just for this issue before we reinvent the wheel? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
