On 6/7/2011 7:22 PM, Adam Katz wrote:
>> header EXTRA_MPART_TYPE         Content-Type =~ / type=/i

On 06/07/2011 08:00 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
> A lot of times rules start off with the writer thinking about the
> whole line, and after they put it down as a rule, there may be
> frivolous patterns... I've caught myself doing it dozens of times. I
> suspect (without really knowing) that happened here.
> 
> Nice catch.
> 
> +1 on making the change for efficiency.
> 
> That said, I propose we should remove this rule entirely, or zero its
> score.
> 
> The S/O of this rule is now 0.100 in ruleqa, and was 0.283 in the
> 3.3.0 corpus for set0.  Clearly it is a lousy indicator of spam, but
> has a force-assigned score of 1.0.

Its s/o is 0.086 on my data.  Nothing depends on it, so I've just
cleared it out altogether (svn r1133500).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to