https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6567
--- Comment #5 from Darxus <[email protected]> 2011-11-03 21:29:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > It's crucial that RBLs etc are applied on the internal/external border, > > > that is > > > the MX border. That's where you also use RBLs for SMTP time rejecting. If RBLs are applied on the internal/external border, that would be -lastexternal, the first IP not included in internal_networks. Which, if you also have trusted_networks defined, could include that IP address. So you'd be testing a trusted_networks address against an RBL. Unless by "internal/external border" you were including trusted_networks as "internal"? > I'm sure you are missing something obvious now. One doesn't run RBL checks for > hosts inside trusted_networks just like you said. Certainly possible, but I don't think so. > Also do not quote documentation etc when trying to make sense of technical > things, it could be misleading or wrong. I suggest you look deeply in the code > and see how things work in the real life. Of course. I did not intend to imply that the documentation was infallible. I did read the code, when I first posted this bug. My understanding matched your description "There are two lists, internal_networks and trusted_networks. Lastexternal and firsttrusted are their identical counterparts (first relay that isn't in those networks)." -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
