On Sat, 3 Dec 2011, Michael Parker wrote:
On Dec 3, 2011, at 11:12 AM, John Hardin wrote:
Okay, from the masscheck this rule looks really attractive:
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20111202-r1209002-n/T_ACH_CANCELLED/detail
1.000 S.O and most hits on spams scoring < 5 points from other rules.
...so can anybody suggest why the masscheck is deciding it's not good enough to
publish?
Is its placement in an #ifplugin-else-endif block causing problems?
Possibly, but I'm not totally sure.
Does it overlap in any significant way with other rules?
See the link for the overlap results.
Would it need to be over the corpora minimums for that part of the process
(scoring and T_ reeval) to even run?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[email protected] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [email protected]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fetters imposed on liberty at home have ever been forged out
of the weapons provided for defense against real, pretended, or
imaginary dangers from abroad. -- James Madison, 1799
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
12 days until Bill of Rights day
