It looks to me like it'd meet all the criteria.  Could it be in a file
with "tflags nopublish" at the top?

--j.

On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 17:12, John Hardin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Okay, from the masscheck this rule looks really attractive:
>
> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20111202-r1209002-n/T_ACH_CANCELLED/detail
>
> 1.000 S.O and most hits on spams scoring < 5 points from other rules.
>
> ...so can anybody suggest why the masscheck is deciding it's not good enough
> to publish?
>
> Is its placement in an #ifplugin-else-endif block causing problems?
>
> --
>  John Hardin KA7OHZ                    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
>  [email protected]    FALaholic #11174     pgpk -a [email protected]
>  key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  The fetters imposed on liberty at home have ever been forged out
>  of the weapons provided for defense against real, pretended, or
>  imaginary dangers from abroad.               -- James Madison, 1799
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  12 days until Bill of Rights day

Reply via email to