https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6721
Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2011-12-12 22:42:40 UTC --- I think there are two solutions to this: 1 - We need more people in masscheck. That's held up because of a security issue. But my theory is more corpora, less swings on the scores. 2 - Perhaps we need something on scores for sandboxes that allows a minimum and a maximum threshold. I seem to remember a recent change that made any scores in sandbox a maximum. But in the end, algorithms that let spammers reuse old tricks after a time are going to need a balance between static scores and dynamic scores. I know every time I've look at getting rid of some old obscure rule, I see some new run of spam that makes me reconsider. In the meantime, if you have specific static scores, I'm happy to throw them on my server and test to lead to a vote here. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
