On 2011-12-13 18:54, [email protected] wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6724
--- Comment #11 from AXB<[email protected]> 2011-12-13 17:54:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
score URIBL_BLACK_BLOCKED 0.001
score URIBL_GREY_BLOCKED 0.001
score URIBL_RED_BLOCK 0.001
Wouldn't URIBL_BLACK / URIBL_GREY / URIBL_RED also hit, whenever those hit, due
to them being urirhssub rules with "a single decimal or hex" value, so it's
checking for a bit mask, not equality?
So we'd need scores that negate the scores of the URIBL rules?
score URIBL_BLACK_BLOCKED 0 -1.775 0 -1.725
score URIBL_GREY_BLOCKED 0 -1.084 0 -0.424
score URIBL_RED_BLOCKED -0.001
what I sugegsted above...
"OFFBUG"
has anybody been bitten, lately by URIBL's .255 case?
seems to me there's a lot of noise which started with DNSWL and is
spreading....
afaik, URIBL has a "limit" of 300k queries/day (when it blocked my trap
server) - way more than other BLs
