https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6724
--- Comment #18 from Karsten Bräckelmann <[email protected]> 2011-12-13 21:25:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) > OK, so URIBL has asked to use bit 1 and changed their ACL so if they return a > block, bit 1 is used. Makes sense with the URIBL return values, and prevents any other rule from triggering at the same time. Obsoletes any rule adjustments per comment 15. > Matthias, if you can decide on a bit (not a bitmask) to return for DNSWL > blocks, we can add the notification rule. Since the BLOCKED indicating return value is entirely non-standard, we are free to pick any value that fits the DNSxL. DNSWL return values for the last octet are not bitmask encoded, and the SA rules use exact matching. Thus, *any* unused return value in 127/8 is possible. No need to decide on a single bit, but a number, including 255. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
