https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6724
Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #34 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2011-12-19 17:15:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #33) > (In reply to comment #31) > > If you can implement this with 127.0.0.255, then the blocked rule is already > > live and I can then turn back on the scoring for DNSWL. > > Is there a reason not to re-enable DNSWL now? It's no-longer violating SA > requirements, right? I wonder if you're assuming DNSWL doesn't want to be > re-enabled in SA until blocking is handled, but I think Matthias wouldn't have > commented what he did if that were the case. > Agreed. I already had it prepped ready to go: svn commit -m 'Turning DNSWL back on now that they don not return FPs for abusive queriers - bug 6724' Sending rules/50_scores.cf Transmitting file data . Committed revision 1220844. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
