https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6889
--- Comment #1 from Mark Martinec <[email protected]> --- > One of them: xt/50_dkim..........................skipped > This rule just runs t/dkim.t. However, that rule appears to be disabled > with an && 0 in the conditions test to run. > > Should this rule be removed in favor of dkim2? This test hasn't worked > since 2007. Yes, please do remove xt/50_dkim.t and t/50_dkim.t, they have been superseded by 50_dkim2.t (or, drop 50_dkim and rename 50_dkim2 to 50_dkim). Remember to update the MANIFEST accordingly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
