https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6919
--- Comment #3 from AXB <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #2) > Those two workarounds are invalid and fix neither my nor anyone else's > problem. > > 1. I know numerous hosters/ISPs who assign generic RDNS entries. This is, by > the way, a perfectly valid and RFC conformant approach if FDNS and RDNS > match, as is the case for ds80-237-211-109.dedicated.hosteurope.de et al. > It's not my or anyone's place to tell them to stop this correct practice > because it causes a false positive in some SA rule. > > 2. I do not trust the IP assignments by HostEurope to be spam-free, > therefore they have no place in my trusted_networks. What I want, however, > is that mails originating from these networks are not wrongly marked as spam > due to overshoot in a SpamAssassin rule. It's legitimate, nobody argues about that. It's also legitimate to assign a score, even a high one, for neglected configs. Now if a server admin prefers to keep a generic pattern he's in for surprises. Not only SA tags with generic patterns. It's becoming common practive to reject mail from PTRs which are not in the sender's domain. so what you want may not be the best for the rest. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
