https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6919
--- Comment #10 from Steve Freegard <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #9) > Maybe the answer here is to try and separate dynamic .vs. generic in the > RDNS_DYNAMIC rule into separate rules and mass-check them to see what effect > it has. We might even find that RDNS_DYNAMIC can actually get a decent > score afterwards. After some tweaking - I've improved RDNS_DYNAMIC on my own corpus: 0.669 2.0254 0.0000 1.000 0.68 0.00 BUG6919_RDNS_DYNAMIC 2.456 4.4740 1.4605 0.754 0.52 0.00 BUG6919_RDNS_GENERIC 2.206 3.7183 1.4605 0.718 0.47 2.64 RDNS_DYNAMIC I've just checked these improved rules into my sandbox for the next run. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
