On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 14:09 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> > Giving this rule positive value would uselessly add score to correct mail,
> > but any negative score increases possibility of false negative.
> >
> > I don't think this should have any score, imho __RP_MATCHES_RCVD for meta
> > rules is just enough. It can be T_ rule if anyone wants, imho.
>
> Any strong opinions on dropping RP_MATCHES_RCVD in favor of a subrule?
+1 Go for it.
There've been repeated complaints (read: reports) about that rule and
its negative score the last few weeks on lists.
Kind of ironic that RP_MATCHES_RCVD -0.8 counters neutral BAYES_50 +0.8.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
