On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 14:09 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Giving this rule positive value would uselessly add score to correct mail,
but any negative score increases possibility of false negative.
I don't think this should have any score, imho __RP_MATCHES_RCVD for meta
rules is just enough. It can be T_ rule if anyone wants, imho.
Any strong opinions on dropping RP_MATCHES_RCVD in favor of a subrule?
+1 Go for it.
If nobody objects by Friday I'll pull it out.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[email protected] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [email protected]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perfect Security and Absolute Safety are unattainable; beware
those who would try to sell them to you, regardless of the cost,
for they are trying to sell you your own slavery.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
509 days since the first successful private support mission to ISS (SpaceX)
