https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7013
--- Comment #7 from Mark Martinec <[email protected]> --- > I'm open to renaming it. We have to change the code again so Michael, if > you can elaborate on your tflag idea, this would be a good time to get that > done. I'd be happier if this change were reverted and the definition of the BAYES_99 rule reverted to what we had before. The new BAYES_999 (under whatever name) would then just match a range from 0.999 to 1.0 and just contribute some additional score points, complementing the BAYES_99. It would fix/regain compatibility with existing code base and non-disruptively add another scoring possibility. Inventing a new tag could still be done later if needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
