https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7013
John Hardin <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #9 from John Hardin <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mark Martinec from comment #7) > > I'm open to renaming it. We have to change the code again so Michael, if > > you can elaborate on your tflag idea, this would be a good time to get that > > done. > > I'd be happier if this change were reverted and the definition > of the BAYES_99 rule reverted to what we had before. > > The new BAYES_999 (under whatever name) would then just match > a range from 0.999 to 1.0 and just contribute some additional > score points, complementing the BAYES_99. > > It would fix/regain compatibility with existing code base > and non-disruptively add another scoring possibility. > > Inventing a new tag could still be done later if needed. +1 as well; probably need to implement static scoring as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
