https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7153
--- Comment #4 from Philip Prindeville <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #3) > Is this closer to what we need? Also trying to figure out whether gic needs > to be 1.4.4 or 1.6.3 as the comment states differently than the patch. Yeah, I had the $gic_have and $gip_have (GeoIP-C and GeoIP-Perl, respectively) backasswards. Good catch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
