https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7234
John Davis <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from John Davis <[email protected]> --- Looking at their Response codes under the "Blacklist Response Codes" and "Whitelist Response Codes" sections. I would recommend the following which follows suit with other DNSRBL and DNSRWLs already included in SA. (I know of a few ISPs who use this RBL and RWL having had hits myself on them.) The Configuration would be as follows which uses the example of what Kevin specified: ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval ## MailBlacklist.com Spam sources header __RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_B eval:check_rbl('emailbl-lastexternal', 'service.mailblacklist.com.') tflags __RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_B net ## MailWhitelist.com Ham sources header __RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_W eval:check_rbl('emailbl-firsttrusted', 'service.mailwhitelist.com.') tflags __RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_W net ##### MailBlacklist.com Definitions - Bad senders # Definitions - Bad senders header __RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_S eval:check_rbl_sub('emailbl-lastexternal', '127.0.0.2') describe __RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_S Listed at MailBlacklist.com, Generic Blacklist Listing (-2) tflags __RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_S net header RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_B5 eval:check_rbl_sub('emailbl-lastexternal', '127.0.0.6') describe RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_B5 Listed at MailBlacklist.com, Very Bad Reputation Sender (-5) tflags RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_B5 net header RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_B4 eval:check_rbl_sub('emailbl-lastexternal', '127.0.0.7') describe RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_B4 Listed at MailBlacklist.com, Bad Reputation Sender (-4) tflags RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_B4 net header RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_B3 eval:check_rbl_sub('emailbl-lastexternal', '127.0.0.8') describe RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_B3 Listed at MailBlacklist.com, Low Reputation Sender (-3) tflags RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_B3 net header RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_B2 eval:check_rbl_sub('emailbl-lastexternal', '127.0.0.9') describe RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_B2 Listed at MailBlacklist.com, Suspicious Sender (-2) tflags RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_B2 net # MailWhitelist.com Definitions - Good senders header RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_W5 eval:check_rbl_sub('emailbl-firsttrusted', '^127\.0\.\d+\.3$') describe RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_W5 Listed at MailWhitelist.com, High Confidence Sender (+5) tflags RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_W5 nice net header RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_W4 eval:check_rbl_sub('emailbl-firsttrusted', '^127\.0\.\d+\.2$') describe RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_W4 Listed at MailWhitelist.com, Medium Confidence Sender (+4) tflags RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_W4 nice net header RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_W3 eval:check_rbl_sub('emailbl-firsttrusted', '^127\.0\.\d+\.1$') describe RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_W3 Listed at MailWhitelist.com, Low Confidence Sender (+3) tflags RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_W3 nice net header RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_W2 eval:check_rbl_sub('emailbl-firsttrusted', '^127\.0\.\d+\.0$') describe RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_W2 Listed at MailWhitelist.com, No Confidence Sender (+2) tflags RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_W2 nice net meta __RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_BL RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_B5 || RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_B4 || RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_B3 tflags __RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_BL net meta RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_SBI __RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_S && !__RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_BL tflags RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_SBI net # MailBlacklist.com Bad meta RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_BL RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_B5 || RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_B4 || RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_B3 || __RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_S describe RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_BL MailBlacklist.com Bad Senders tflags RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_BL net # MailWhitelist.com Good meta RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_WL RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_W5 || RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_W4 || RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_W3 describe RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_WL MailWhitelist.com Good Senders tflags RCVD_IN_EMAILBL_WL nice net endif -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
