https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7416
--- Comment #11 from RW <rwmailli...@googlemail.com> --- (In reply to Dave Jones from comment #9) > DKIM_VALID_ENV and DKIM_VALID_AU_ENV rules would be helpful for use in meta > rules. It does not have anything directly related to determining ham or > spam. > > Basically this gets into the responsibility of DMARC so until that SA plugin > is written, No it doesn't, dmarc doesn't say anything about dkim for the envelope sender. > it would be beneficial to have these to determine authenticity > (not authorization like SPF handles) alignment with the envelope-from. It adds nothing at all. > As DMARC gains traction like SPF has the past few years, forwarding is going > to become taboo until SRS is widely adopted. SRS provides no benefit at all under DMARC. the fact that you thought it did speaks volumes about your ignorance of the basics. > Get ready for it. Don't argue about it. I'm not arguing with DMARC, I'm objecting to people who clearly don't understand the issues changing the code. Go away and read the RFCs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
