https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7397
RW <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #12 from RW <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Michael P from comment #8) > I also propose that going forward ONLY the channels.d configuration be used, > rather than the older method of accepting just a single channel file > structure. IMO the best way to use sa-update on multiple channels is to run it on one channel at a time. That way the shell script knows which channels have updated and which have failed. For example it may be useful to delete minor channels failing lint automatically rather than have them hold-up updates to core rules. I'd rather not lose this flexibility. There are also other uses for command-line overrides, such as trouble-shooting, or downloading a channel just to look at the rules. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
