https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7397
--- Comment #22 from Henrik Krohns <apa...@hege.li> --- What Kevin said. It's just an expectation of 3rd parties using bad scoring or poison pill rules. No one is forced to use the few lines of extra code, but it's available if needed. (In reply to Michael P from comment #20) > After all, if a channel sets unrealistic scores, it simply would not be > something someone wants to use? With all respect, that's some seriously naive thinking. While official SA updates try hard to maintain reasonable quality and scoring, are you really expecting that 3rd parties do any serious mass-checking or never make mistakes? I've had my fair share of problems with ClamAV/Sanesecurity too.. Not going to deny that KAM.cf was an early inspiration for this. :-D I would most definitely use --score-limit ~2-3 for any external channel. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
