https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7735
John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jhar...@impsec.org
--- Comment #3 from John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> ---
I object to many of these rules being marked as TFLAGS NET.
Your trivial examples are indeed valid, but for more-complex rules where the
NET rule is used simply as an exclusion to reduce FPs (rather than a critical
component of the logical rule itself), the effect of the NET rule being zero is
not important, as the non-NET masscheck scores will reflect the results of that
NET exclusion rule not having an effect: the score will be lower for non-NET
because the S/O will be lower. The overall rule should not be *entirely
disabled* in a non-NET environment.
For this reason I also dislike the inheritance being automatic.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
