https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7735

--- Comment #9 from Loren Wilton <lwil...@earthlink.net> ---
Minor correction to the previous post. I said there that there was a sync rule
list and a sync meta list, and the sync rules were processed in priority order,
then the sync meta rules. This isn't quite correct.

The two sync lists need to be interleaved. The sync rules of priority N are
run, then the sync meta rules of the same priority. The list assignment
processing will have seen to it that a meta rule is at a higher (later
evaluation) priority than any rules that it depends on.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to