https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7953
--- Comment #8 from Bill Cole <billc...@apache.org> --- (In reply to Bill Cole from comment #4) [...] > I have been trying for some time to think up ways to do better oversight of > what's in the 'bad TLD' lists so that we can say with more grounding that a > particular one still belongs there. I just have to devise test rules that > will provide better data to figure that out without wreaking havoc. I've had a test for JUST .space (T_SCC_TLD_SPACE ) running in QA for ~8 weeks now, and it has had a S/O (spam hits/overall hits) consistently in the 0.84-0.92 range. I am pulling both that test rule and the entry in the 'suspicious TLD' list, as that's too substantially below the overall S/O of the aggregate rule and below what we'd publish as a standalone rule. Hits on .space should go away after the change works its way through QA. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
