On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 11:29:40AM +0200, Michael Storz wrote: > > Yes, it is really simple and I can understand it now :-), thanks. However, I > would still prefer to be able to use the optimized version of MIME::Base32 > if this module is installed. For us the installation is no problem, it would > just be a statement in our puppet class for SpamAssassin to install it on > all servers with SpamAssassin. > > Ah, I just saw that we still need to use the SH.pm plugin, since HashBL.pm > doesn't support attachment hashes. That's where the performance of > encode_base32 makes the biggest difference. Good thing I rewrote the whole > SH.pm plugin to support caching.
But all the calls of encode_base32 in SH.pm only encode results of sha256() call? The performance should make no different as it's tiny string. I'd rather spend my time actually implementing the attachment hashes. :-)
