Am 2022-05-18 11:40, schrieb Henrik K:
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 11:29:40AM +0200, Michael Storz wrote:
Yes, it is really simple and I can understand it now :-), thanks.
However, I
would still prefer to be able to use the optimized version of
MIME::Base32
if this module is installed. For us the installation is no problem, it
would
just be a statement in our puppet class for SpamAssassin to install it
on
all servers with SpamAssassin.
Ah, I just saw that we still need to use the SH.pm plugin, since
HashBL.pm
doesn't support attachment hashes. That's where the performance of
encode_base32 makes the biggest difference. Good thing I rewrote the
whole
SH.pm plugin to support caching.
But all the calls of encode_base32 in SH.pm only encode results of
sha256()
call? The performance should make no different as it's tiny string.
Uups, you are absolutely right, forget it.
I'd rather spend my time actually implementing the attachment hashes.
:-)
Uhh, that would be great :-)
Michael
