https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7981
--- Comment #29 from Michael Storz <sa-...@lrz.de> --- (In reply to Henrik Krohns from comment #27) > Ok I just stumbled on some eval functions returning undef wrongly.. ... > All would be fixed days ago already, if Michael simply had reported which > plugins or functions are affected, if he already went through all this. > Henrik, you said my patches could be cosmetic at most and Sydney didn't want to wait for the patches and started rolling out prev2 instead. This was a clear sign to me that there was no interest in my patches. So why on earth would I rush to make the patches available? A simple question asking if I could upload the patches that are already done would have sufficed. But this is not my normal way of working. I usually make patches available only when I am completely satisfied with them. And since there are still problems with got_hit and rule_ready from my point of view, the problem with the correct return values is not completely solved for me yet. But I have already uploaded the patches for return value undef after calling got_hit/rule_ready to avoid further complaints. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
