https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7981
--- Comment #30 from Henrik Krohns <apa...@hege.li> --- (In reply to Michael Storz from comment #29) > (In reply to Henrik Krohns from comment #27) > > Ok I just stumbled on some eval functions returning undef wrongly.. > ... > > All would be fixed days ago already, if Michael simply had reported which > > plugins or functions are affected, if he already went through all this. > > > > Henrik, you said my patches could be cosmetic at most and Sydney didn't want > to wait for the patches and started rolling out prev2 instead. This was a > clear sign to me that there was no interest in my patches. So why on earth > would I rush to make the patches available? A simple question asking if I > could upload the patches that are already done would have sufficed. I have only vague idea of what you are working on, or what exactly you consider problems ("chaos"), and when you might be done with them. Then there's the problem of ICLA, which you didn't acknowledge if you are going to sign and submit, so your patches can even be accepted. I appreciate some of your ideas from which some good improvements and bug fixes have resulted, but I'm simply too stressed over this whole 4.0.0 release process that just keeps going on and on. There isn't enough stamina to wait for some vaguely defined patches, which might or might not solve something actually relevant. Again, performance or messy code patches can wait for later release. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.