https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=8087
Henrik Krohns <apa...@hege.li> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |apa...@hege.li
--- Comment #4 from Henrik Krohns <apa...@hege.li> ---
Yes I was wondering what's the reason to even use published->p.
---> nic.at
$result->result = fail
$result->disposition = reject
$result->published->p = reject
Dec 7 16:53:16.091 [2319877] dbg: DMARC: result: fail, disposition: reject,
dkim: fail, spf: fail (spf: none, spf_helo: none)
---> news.nic.at
$result->result = fail
$result->disposition = none
$result->published->p = reject
Dec 7 16:53:47.083 [2319912] dbg: DMARC: result: fail, disposition: none,
dkim: fail, spf: fail (spf: none, spf_helo: none)
I'm +1 to commit now if others deem it safe (I have really no clue about DMARC
anyway, but looks logical). You can be sure there will be tons of other bugs to
fix for 4.0.1..
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
